Free your team from routine in messages and documents
We help automate collecting reports from contractors, clarifications, approvals with clients and document preparation.
We start with one recurring process — with your team in control of key decisions.
You can write to us — no call needed.
M-17 · Line installation
- 26 October
- 32 h
- 27 October
- 32 h
- 28 October
- 32 h
Awaiting client confirmation
Example. Fictional data.
It’s all in the messages. It just needs to be collected, checked and approved
-
Information arrives in pieces
The contractor sent a voice message, then a photo, then a correction. You need to figure out which order it all belongs to and which data is current.
-
You keep going back for what’s missing
No site specified, no date, a document not attached. The manager asks questions and sends reminders until everything is collected.
-
The client and the contractor have different numbers
Hours or work volumes don’t match. You need to find out why and get both sides to confirm.
-
Approved data gets retyped by hand again
From messages to a spreadsheet, from the spreadsheet to a report or invoice data. Corrections have to be carried over too.
In installation it’s hours and timesheets. In logistics, trip statuses and delivery documents. In maintenance, call-out reports and acceptance certificates.
See how such a process can be automatedFrom a contractor’s message to hours confirmed by the client
See how AI collects information, asks for what’s missing and passes discrepancies to your team.
Example with fictional data.
How the example goes
M-17 · Line installation
No timesheet yet
| Date | Person-hours |
|---|---|
| 26.10.2026 | 32 |
| 27.10.2026 | 32 |
| 28.10.2026 | 32 |
| Total | 96 |
Read the whole example
Contractor: “Four people, eight hours each, 26–28 October.” The system clarifies the site and the daily breakdown. Version 1: 32 + 32 + 32 = 96 person-hours.
If the client confirms 96 hours, both sides confirm version 1. The data is ready for invoicing.
If the client confirms 92 hours, the manager looks into the discrepancy: one installer left four hours early on 28 October. The contractor corrects the last day to 28 hours. Version 2: 32 + 32 + 28 = 92. Both sides confirm the new version separately.
The system makes no payments and signs no legal documents. A responsible employee checks the data before the invoice is prepared.
AI collects and clarifies the data. The client confirms the volume, and the manager resolves discrepancies. A responsible employee checks the data before invoicing.
Review my processYour process. Your app. Only the actions you need.
We build a simple app around how your company works. Together we decide what should be on the screen and how to use it: what information to collect, what to confirm and where your decision is needed.
-
Everything you need in front of you
Clear actions, documents and statuses needed in daily work.
-
We design the interface with you
Screens, button names and the order of actions are adapted to your process.
-
Each participant gets their own view
The set of actions depends on the role: provide information, confirm the result or resolve a discrepancy.
Jobs and approvals
M-17 · Discrepancy in hours
One installer left four hours early on 28 October.
Interface example. Fictional jobs and statuses.
The app needs to be installed. We’ll decide which participants need the app screens and who will keep communicating via messenger when we review your process.
How much does manual work cost your team?
Estimate the time spent collecting information, sending reminders, reconciling and transferring data. Rough figures are enough.
Count those who communicate with contractors, check information and prepare documents.
Salary plus employer costs; an average is fine. Do not include payments for subcontractor work.
Approximately, from 0 to 100%.
Your estimate will appear here
Fill in the three fields to estimate the cost of your team’s time.
How much of this work can be automated will be determined when we review the process. Freed-up time can go to other tasks; any actual cost reduction depends on how the solution is implemented.
This is an estimate based on your inputs, not a promise of savings. The cost of implementation, the app and support is not included.
Which process would you like to simplify first?
Tell us what your team collects, checks or approves by hand between the client and contractors. Answer a few questions or leave a short description — you can review and add to it before sending.
You can write to us — no call needed.
Up to 10,000 characters. Do not include other people’s personal data or confidential documents.
Description of your process
The description is not confirmed yet.
How would you prefer to receive a written reply?
- Story
- Review of the description
- Contact and sending
We’ll study the description, clarify the details and discuss which process to take into a pilot. The app’s scope, interface, cost and timeline are agreed separately.
A description is enough for the first contact: no documents or access to work correspondence are needed.
Start of the example
We’ll show how an approved timesheet comes out of the messages.
No message from the contractor yet.
Contractor’s message
Information received. The timesheet still lacks a breakdown.
The system does not treat unconfirmed information as an approved result.
96 hours for the crew over three days.
Clarifying the details
Clarifying the site, dates and crew.
The contractor clarified: line installation M-17, four people, eight hours each, 26–28 October.
96 hours for the crew over three days.
Please specify the site, dates and hours per day.
M-17. Four people, eight hours each, 26–28 October.
Timesheet version 1
Version 1 · 96 person-hours reported
The timesheet is based on the contractor’s information and awaits the client’s review.
Four people, eight hours each, 26–28 October.
Timesheet created: 32 + 32 + 32 = 96 person-hours.
Discrepancy in hours
The client confirms 92 of 96 hours
Review needed: 4 person-hours. Neither version has been approved by both sides yet.
96 person-hours reported.
For 28 October I confirm 28 hours: one installer left four hours early.
Manager’s decision
Clarification requested from the contractor
The manager compares both versions and asks the contractor to confirm the reason for the discrepancy.
I confirm 92 hours.
Please confirm: did one installer leave four hours early on 28 October?
Corrected timesheet
Version 2 · 92 person-hours
The contractor corrected the last day to 28 hours. The new version awaits confirmation from both sides.
Yes, correcting the last day to 28 hours.
Version 2: 32 + 32 + 28 = 92. Two confirmations required.
Confirmed by both sides
Version 2 · both sides confirmed 92 hours
The data is ready for invoicing. A responsible employee checks it before the invoice is issued.
I confirm version 2: 92 hours.
I confirm version 2: 92 hours.
Client confirmation
The client confirms 96 hours
Version 1 awaits the contractor’s confirmation.
The timesheet is correct. I confirm 96 hours.
Confirmed by both sides
Version 1 · both sides confirmed 96 hours
The data is ready for invoicing. No payment or legal signature has been made.
I confirm 96 hours.
I confirm version 1: 96 hours.

